What is cointegration? The discussions here and here are bad because they link the definition to differencing a time series. In fact, to understand cointegration, you need two notions: stationary processes (please read before continuing) and linear dependence.

**Definition**. We say that vectors are *linearly dependent* if there exist numbers , not all of which are zero, such that the linear combination is a zero vector.

Recall from this post that stationary processes play the role of zero in the set of all processes. Replace in the above definition "vectors" with "processes" and "a zero vector" with "a stationary process" and - *voilà *- you have the definition of cointegration:

**Definition**. We say that processes are *cointegrated* if there exist numbers , not all of which are zero, such that the linear combination is a stationary process. Remembering that each process is a collection of random variables indexed with time moments , we obtain a definition that explicitly involves time: processes are *cointegrated* if there exist numbers , not all of which are zero, such that where is a stationary process.

To fully understand the implications, you need to know all the intricacies of linear dependence. I do not want to plunge into this lengthy discussion here. Instead, I want to explain how this definition leads to a regression in case of two processes.

If are cointegrated, then there exist numbers , at least one of which is not zero, such that where is a stationary process. If , we can solve for obtaining with and . This is almost a regression, except that the mean of may not be zero. We can represent , where , . Then the above equation becomes , which is simple regression. The case leads to a similar result.

**Practical recommendation**. To see if are cointegrated, regress one of them on the other and test the residuals for stationarity.

Post Views: 59

*Related*

## Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.