Sum of random variables and convolution
Link between double and iterated integrals
Why do we need this link? For simplicity consider the rectangle The integrals
and
both are taken over the rectangle but they are not the same.
is a double (two-dimensional) integral, meaning that its definition uses elementary areas, while
is an iterated integral, where each of the one-dimensional integrals uses elementary segments. To make sense of this, you need to consult an advanced text in calculus. The difference notwithstanding, in good cases their values are the same. Putting aside the question of what is a "good case", we concentrate on geometry: how a double integral can be expressed as an iterated integral.
It is enough to understand the idea in case of an oval on the plane. Let
be the function that describes the lower boundary of the oval and let
be the function that describes the upper part. Further, let the vertical lines
and
be the minimum and maximum values of
in the oval (see Chart 1).

Chart 1. The boundary of the oval above the green line is described by u(x) and below - by l(x)
We can paint the oval with strokes along red lines from to
If we do this for all
we'll have painted the whole oval. This corresponds to the representation of
as the union of segments
with
and to the equality of integrals
(double integral) (iterated integral)
Density of a sum of two variables
Assumption 1 Suppose the random vector has a density
and define
(unlike the convolution theorem below, here
don't have to be independent).
From the definitions of the distribution function and probability
we have
The integral on the right is a double integral. The painting analogy (see Chart 2)

Chart 2. Integration for sum of two variables
suggests that
Hence,
Differentiating both sides with respect to we get
If we start with the inner integral that is with respect to and the outer integral
with respect to
then similarly
Exercise. Suppose the random vector has a density
and define
Find
Hint: review my post on Leibniz integral rule.
Convolution theorem
In addition to Assumption 1, let be independent. Then
and the above formula gives
This is denoted as and called a convolution.
The following may help to understand this formula. The function is a density (it is non-negative and integrates to 1). Its graph is a mirror image of that of
with respect to the vertical axis. The function
is a shift of
by
along the horizontal axis. For fixed
it is also a density. Thus in the definition of convolution we integrate the product of two densities
Further, to understand the asymptotic behavior of
when
imagine two bell-shaped densities
and
When
goes to, say, infinity, the humps of those densities are spread apart more and more. The hump of one of them gets multiplied by small values of the other. That's why
goes to zero, in a certain sense.
The convolution of two densities is always a density because it is non-negative and integrates to one:
Replacing in the inner integral we see that this is
You must be logged in to post a comment.