## Sufficiency and minimal sufficiency

### Sufficient statistic

I find that in the notation of a statistic it is better to reflect the dependence on the argument. So I write for a statistic, where is a sample, instead of a faceless or

**Definition 1**. The statistic is called **sufficient for the parameter** if the distribution of conditional on does not depend on

The main results on sufficiency and minimal sufficiency become transparent if we look at them from the point of view of Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation.

Let be the joint density of the vector , where is a parameter (possibly a vector). The **ML estimator** is obtained by maximizing over the function with fixed at the observed data. The estimator depends on the data and can be denoted

**Fisher-Neyman theorem**. is sufficient for if and only if the joint density can be represented as

(1)

where, as the notation suggests, depends on only through and does not depend on

Maximizing the left side of (1) is the same thing as maximizing because does not depend on But this means that depends on only through A sufficient statistic is all you need to find the ML estimator. This interpretation is easier to understand than the definition of sufficiency.

### Minimal sufficient statistic

**Definition 2**.** A** sufficient statistic is called **minimal sufficient** if for any other statistic there exists a function such that

A **level set** is a set of type for a constant (which in general can be a constant vector). See the visualization of level sets. A level set is also called a **preimage** and denoted When is one-to-one the preimage contains just one point. When is not one-to-one the preimage contains more than one point. The wider it is the less information about the sample carries the statistic (because many data sets are mapped to a single point and you cannot tell one data set from another by looking at the statistic value). In the definition of the minimal sufficient statistic we have

Since generally contains more than one point, this shows that the level sets of are generally wider than those of Since this is true for any carries less information about than any other statistic.

Definition 2 is an existence statement and is difficult to verify directly as there are words "for any" and "exists". Again it's better to relate it to ML estimation.

Suppose for two sets of data there is a positive number such that

(2)

Maximizing the left side we get the estimator Maximizing we get Since does not depend on (2) tells us that

Thus, if two sets of data satisfy (2), the ML method cannot distinguish between and and supplies the same estimator. Let us call **indistinguishable** if there is a positive number such that (2) is true.

An equation means that belong to the same level set.

**Characterization of minimal sufficiency**. A statistic is minimal sufficient if and only if its level sets coincide with sets of indistinguishable

The advantage of this formulation is that it relates a geometric notion of level sets to the ML estimator properties. The formulation in the guide by J. Abdey is:

A statistic is minimal sufficient if and only if the equality is equivalent to (2).

Rewriting (2) as

(3)

we get a practical way of finding a minimal sufficient statistic: form the ratio on the left of (3) and find the sets along which the ratio does not depend on Those sets will be level sets of

You must be logged in to post a comment.