General properties of symmetric matrices
Here we consider properties of symmetric matrices that will be used to prove their diagonalizability.
What are the differences between
and 
Vectors in both spaces have coordinates. In
we can multiply vectors by real numbers and in
- by complex numbers. This affects the notions of linear combinations, linear independence, dimension and scalar product. We indicate only the differences to watch for.
If in we multiply vectors only by real numbers, it becomes a space of dimension
Let's take
to see why.
Example 1. If we take then any complex number
is a multiple of
with the scaling coefficient
Thus,
is a one-dimensional space in this sense. On the other hand, if only multiplication by real numbers is allowed, then we can take
as a basis and then
and
is two-dimensional. To avoid confusion, just use scaling by the right numbers.
The scalar product in is given by
and in
by
As a result, for the second scalar product we have
for complex
(some people call this antilinearity, to distinguish it from linearity
for real
).
Definition 1. For a matrix with possibly complex entries we denote
The matrix
is called an adjoint or a conjugate of
Exercise 1. Prove that for any
Proof. For complex numbers we have
Therefore
Thus, when considering matrices in conjugation should be used instead of transposition. In particular, instead of symmetry
the equation
should be used. Matrices satisfying the last equation are called self-adjoint. The theory of self-adjoint matrices in
is very similar to that of symmetric matrices in
Keeping in mind two applications (regression analysis and optimization), we consider only square matrices with real entries. Even in this case one is forced to work with
from time to time because, in general, eigenvalues can be complex numbers.
General properties of symmetric matrices
is assumed a square matrix with real entries. When we extend
from
to
is defined by the same expression as before but
is allowed to be from
and the scalar product in
is replaced by the scalar product in
The extension is denoted
Exercise 2. If is symmetric, then all eigenvalues of
are real.
Proof. Suppose is an eigenvalue of
Using Exercise 1 and the symmetry of
we have
Since we have
This shows that
is real.
Exercise 3. If is symmetric, then it has at least one real eigenvector.
Proof. We know that has at least one complex eigenvalue
. By Exercise 2, this eigenvalue must be real. Thus, we have
with some nonzero
Separating real and imaginary parts of
we have
with some
At least one of
is not zero. Thus a real eigenvector exists.
We need to generalize Exercise 3 to the case when acts in a subspace. This is done in the next two exercises.
Definition 2. A subspace is called an invariant subspace of
if
Example 2. If is an eigenvector of
then the subspace
spanned by
is an invariant subspace of
This is because
implies
Exercise 4. If is symmetric and
is a non-trivial invariant subspace of
, then
has an eigenvector in
Proof. By the definition of an invariant subspace, the restriction of to
defined by
acts from
to
. By Exercise 3, applied to
it has an eigenvector in
, which is also an eigenvector of
Exercise 5. a) If is an (real) eigenvalue of
then it is an eigenvalue of
b) If
is a real eigenvalue of
then it is an eigenvalue of
This is summarized as
see the spectrum notation.
See if you can prove this yourself following the ideas used above.