Matrix similarity
Switching bases
The basis consisting of unit vectors is simple in that the coefficients in the representation $latex x=\sum x_ie_i$ are exactly the components of the vector $latex x.$ With other types of bases it is not like that: the dependence of coefficients in
(1) $latex x=\sum\xi_iu_i$
on $latex x$ for a general basis $latex u_1,...,u_n$ is not so simple.
Exercise 1. Put the basis vectors side by side, $latex U=(u_1,...,u_n)$ and write the vector of coefficients $latex \xi $ as a column vector. Then (1) becomes $latex U\xi =x,$ so that $latex \xi =U^{-1}x.$
Proof. By the basis definition, $latex \sum\xi_iu_i$ runs over $latex R^n$ and therefore $latex \text{Img}(U)=R^n.$ This implies $latex \det U\neq 0.$ The rest is obvious.
The explicit formula from Exercise 1 shows, in particular, that the vector of coefficients is uniquely determined by and depends linearly on $latex x.$ The coefficients $latex \eta_i$ of $latex x$ in another basis $latex v_1,...,v_n$
(2) $latex x=\sum\eta_i v_i$
may be different from those in (1). For future applications, we need to know how the coefficients in one basis are related to those in another. Put the basis vectors side by side, $latex V=(v_1,...,v_n),$ and write $latex \eta$ as a column vector.
Exercise 2. Let $latex u_1,...,u_n$ and $latex v_1,...,v_n$ be two bases in $latex R^n.$ Then
(3) $latex \eta=V^{-1}U\xi.$
Proof. With our notation (1) and (2) become $latex x=U\xi$ and $latex x=V\eta.$ Thus, $latex U\xi=V\eta$ and (3) follows.
Definition 1. The matrix $latex C=V^{-1}U$ in (3) is called a transition matrix from $latex u_1,...,u_n$ to $latex v_1,...,v_n$.
Matrix representation of a linear transformation
This topic in case of an orthonormal basis was considered earlier. Some people find the next general construction simpler.
Let $latex u_{1},...,u_{n}$ be a basis and decompose $latex x$ as in (1). Let $latex \mathcal{A}$ be a linear transformation. From
(5) $latex \mathcal{A}x=\sum \xi _{i}\mathcal{A}u_{i}$
we see that the vectors $latex \mathcal{A}u_{i},\ i=1,...,n,$ uniquely determine $latex \mathcal{A}$. Decompose them further as $latex \mathcal{A}u_{i}=\sum_{k}a_{ki}u_{k}.$ Let us introduce a column-vector $latex A^{(i)}$ by $latex A^{(i)}=(a_{1i},...,a_{ni})^{T}.$ Then the last equation takes the form $latex \mathcal{A}u_{i}=UA^{(i)},$ $latex
i=1,...,n.$ With the matrix $latex A=(A^{(1)},...,A^{(n)})$ we can write one equation instead of $latex n:$
(6) $latex \mathcal{A}U=UA.$
Combining (5), (6) and Exercise 1 we get $latex \mathcal{A}x=\mathcal{A}U\xi=UAU^{-1}x.$ Since $latex x$ is arbitrary, the linear transformation $latex \mathcal{A}$ in the basis $latex U$ can be identified with the matrix $latex UAU^{-1}:$
(7) $latex \mathcal{A}=UAU^{-1}.$
Definition 2. The matrix $latex A$ that is defined by (6) or (7) is called a representation of the linear transformation $latex \mathcal{A}$ in the basis $latex u_{1},...,u_{n}.$
Note two special cases: 1) if the basis $latex u_1,...,u_n$ is orthonormal, then $latex U$ is an orthogonal matrix and 2) when we use the orthonormal basis of unit vectors, $latex U=I$ and $latex \mathcal{A}=A.$
Changing bases to analyze matrices
We want to see how the representations of a linear transformation $latex \mathcal{A}$ in two bases are related to each other. For a basis $latex u_{1},...,u_{n}$ summarized in the matrix $latex U$ we have (7). To reflect dependence of $latex A$ on the basis, let us denote it $latex A_{U}.$ Then from (7) $latex \mathcal{A}=UA_{U}U^{-1}.$ Similarly, for another basis $latex v_{1},...,v_{n}$ we have $latex \mathcal{A}=VA_{V}V^{-1}.$ The last two equations lead to $latex UA_{U}U^{-1}=VA_{V}V^{-1}.$ Hence, $latex A_{U}=U^{-1}VA_{V}V^{-1}U.$ Here $latex C=V^{-1}U$ is the transition matrix, so this can be written as
(8) $latex A_{U}=C^{-1}A_{V}C.$
Definition 3. If there is a nonsingular matrix $latex C$ such that (8) is true, then the matrix $latex A_{U}$ is called similar to $latex A_{V}.$
Depending on the choice of the bases, one matrix may be simpler than the other.
← Previous: Law and order in the set of matrices | Next: Orthogonal matrices →
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.