Action of a matrix in its root subspace
The purpose of the following discussion is to reveal the matrix form of $latex A$ in $latex N_{\lambda }^{(p)}.$
Definition 1. Nonzero elements of $latex N_{\lambda }^{(p)}$ are called root vectors. This definition can be detailed as follows:
Elements of $latex N_{\lambda }^{(1)}\setminus {0}$ are eigenvalues.
Elements of $latex N_{\lambda }^{(2)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(1)}$ are called root vectors of 1st order.
...
Elements of $latex N_{\lambda }^{(p)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(p-1)}$ are called root vectors of order $latex p-1$.
Thus, root vectors belong to
$latex N_\lambda^{(p)} \setminus{0}=\left( N_\lambda^{(p)} \setminus N_\lambda^{(p-1)} \right) \cup ... \cup \left( N_\lambda^{(2)} \setminus N_\lambda^{(1)}\right) \cup \left( N_\lambda^{(1)} \setminus {0} \right)$
where the sets of root vectors of different orders do not intersect.
Exercise 1. $latex (A-\lambda I)\left( N_{\lambda }^{(k)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(k-1)}\right) \subset \left( N_{\lambda }^{(k-1)}\setminus N_{\lambda}^{(k-2)}\right) .$
Proof. Suppose $latex x\in N_{\lambda }^{(k)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(k-1)},$ that is, $latex (A-\lambda I)^{k}x=0$ and $latex (A-\lambda I)^{k-1}x\neq 0.$ Denoting $latex y=(A-\lambda I)x,$ we have $latex (A-\lambda I)^{k-1}y=0$ and $latex (A-\lambda I)^{k-2}y\neq 0,$ which means that $latex y\in N_{\lambda }^{(k-1)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(k-2)}$ and $latex A-\lambda I$ maps $latex N_{\lambda }^{(k)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(k-1)}$ into $latex N_{\lambda }^{(k-1)}\setminus N_{\lambda}^{(k-2)}.$
Now, starting from some $latex x_{p}\in N_{\lambda }^{(p)}\setminus N_{\lambda}^{(p-1)},$ we extend a chain of root vectors all the way to an eigenvector. By Exercise 1, the vector $latex x_{p-1}=(A-\lambda I)x_{p}$ belongs to $latex N_{\lambda }^{(p-1)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(p-2)}.$ From the definition of $latex x_{p-1}$ we see that
(1) $latex Ax_{p}=\lambda x_{p}+x_{p-1},$ $latex x_{p-1}\in N_{\lambda}^{(p-1)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(p-2)}$
($latex x_{p}$ is an "eigenvector" up to a root vector of lower order). Similarly, denoting $latex x_{p-2}=(A-\lambda I)x_{p-1},$ we have
(2) $latex Ax_{p-1}=\lambda x_{p-1}+x_{p-2},$ $latex x_{p-2}\in N_{\lambda}^{(p-2)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(p-3)}.$
...
Continuing in the same way, we get $latex x_{1}=(A-\lambda I)x_{2}\in N_{\lambda}^{(1)}\setminus {0},$
(3) $latex Ax_{2}=\lambda x_{2}+x_{1},$ $latex x_{1}\in N_{\lambda}^{(1)}\setminus {0},$
(4) $latex Ax_{1}=\lambda x_{1},$ $latex x_{1}\neq 0.$
Exercise 2. The vectors $latex x_{1},...,x_{p}$ defined above are linearly independent.
Proof. If $latex \sum_{j=1}^{p}a_{j}x_{j}=0,$ then $latex a_{p}x_{p}=-\sum_{j=1}^{p-1}a_{j}x_{j}.$ Here the left side belongs to $latex N_{\lambda}^{(p)}\setminus N_{\lambda }^{(p-1)}$ and the right side belongs to $latex N_{\lambda }^{(p-1)}$ because of inclusion relations. Hence, $latex a_{p}=0.$ Similarly, all other coefficients are zero.
By Exercise 2, the vectors $latex x_{1},...,x_{p}$ form a basis in $latex L=span(x_{1},...,x_{p}).$
Exercise 3. The transformation $latex A$ in $latex L$ is given by the matrix
(5) $latex A=\left(\begin{array}{ccccc}\lambda & 1 & 0 & ... & 0 \\0 & \lambda & 1 & ... & 0 \\
... & ... & ... & ... & ... \\0 & 0 & 0 & ... & 1 \\v\\0 & 0 & 0 & ... & \lambda\end{array}
\right) =\lambda I+J$
where $latex J$ is a matrix with unities in the first superdiagonal and zeros everywhere else.
Proof. Since $latex x_{1},...,x_{p}$ is taken as the basis, $latex x_{i}$ can be identified with the unit column-vector $latex e_{i}.$ The equations (1)-(4) take the form
$latex Ae_{1}=\lambda e_{1},$ $latex Ae_{j}=\lambda e_{j}+e_{j-1},$ $latex j=2,...,p.$
Putting these equations side by side we get
$latex AI=A\left( e_{1},...,e_{p}\right) =\left( Ae_{1},...,Ae_{p}\right) =\left(\lambda e_{1},\lambda e_{2}+e_{1},...,\lambda e_{p}+e_{p-1}\right) =$
=$latex \left(\begin{array}{cccc}\lambda & 1 & ... & 0 \\0 & \lambda & ... & 0 \\
... & ... & ... & ... \\0 & 0 & ... & 1 \\0 & 0 & ... & \lambda\end{array}\right) .$
Definition 2. The matrix in (5) is called a Jordan cell.
← Previous: Properties of root subspaces | Next: Chipping off root subspaces →
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.