Geometry of linear equations: orthogonal complement and equation solvability
From orthogonality of vectors to orthogonality of subspaces
Definition 1. Let be a linear subspace of
Its orthogonal complement
is defined as the set of all vectors orthogonal to all elements of
Exercise 1. Let be the
axis on the plane. Find
Solution. The condition for all
implies
The component
is free. Thus,
is the
axis.
Similarly, the orthogonal complement of the
axis is the
axis. This fact is generalized as follows:
Theorem (on second orthocomplement) For any linear subspace one has
.
This statement is geometrically simple but the proof is rather complex and will be omitted (see Akhiezer & Glazman, Theory of Linear Operators in Hilbert Space, Dover Publications, 1993, Chapter 1, sections 6 and 7). It's good to keep in mind what makes it possible. For any set its orthogonal complement
can be defined in the same way:
As in Exercise 1, you can show that if
contains just the unit vector of the
axis, then
is the
axis and therefore
is the
axis. Thus, in this example we have a strict inclusion
The equality is achieved only for linear subspaces.
Exercise 2. In consider the
axis
Can you tell what
is?
Exercise 3. and
Link between image of a matrix and null space of its transpose
Exercise 4. The rule for a transpose of a product implies that for any
(1)
Exercise 5 (second characterization of matrix image) (and, consequently,
).
Proof. Let us prove that
(2) .
To this end, we first prove the inclusion Let
. For an arbitrary
we have
Hence by (1)
Since
is arbitrary, we can put
and obtain
This implies
and
Conversely, to prove suppose
Then
and for an arbitrary
we have
Since
runs over
this means that
Passing to orthogonal complements in (2), by the theorem on second orthocomplement we get what we need.
Definition 2. Let be two subspaces. We say that
is their orthogonal sum if 1) every element
can be decomposed as
with
and 2) every element of
is orthogonal to every element of
Orthogonality of
to
implies
which, in turn, guarantees uniqueness of the representation
Exercise 6. Assume that is of size
. Exercise 5 and Exercise 3 imply
and
.
The importance of Exercise 5 is explained by the fact that the null space of a matrix is easier to describe analytically than the image. For the next summary, you might want to review the conclusion on the role of the null space.
Summary. 1) In order to see if has solutions, check if
is orthogonal to
In particular, if
is one-to-one, then
and
has solutions for all
(see Exercise 3 above).
2) If is one-to-one, then
may have only unique solutions.
3) If both and
are one-to-one, then
has a unique solution for any
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.